Shop

The Diviniti Journal · No. 06 · Ritual

Ritual, and its cheaper cousin

Routine and ritual look identical from outside. Same time, same actions, same order. The difference is whether any of it means anything, and that is impossible to photograph.

A routine is efficient. It exists so that something gets done without deliberation, and the mark of a good one is that you stop noticing it at all.

A ritual is the opposite. It is deliberately inefficient, and the inefficiency is the entire mechanism, because attention is what it is for. Strip the attention out and you are left with the same fifteen minutes doing nothing.

What rituals were doing before we called them self-care

Emile Durkheim, writing in 1912, argued that the function of religious ritual was not primarily belief. It was assembly. Rituals gathered people, marked time, and produced the feeling of belonging to something larger than the person performing them, and the beliefs were downstream of that rather than the cause of it.

That is worth sitting with, because almost everything left of ritual in a modern week is solitary. The morning practice. The evening wind-down. The walk. All real, all private, all performed alone with a device nearby. We kept the form and lost the assembly, and then wondered why the form felt thinner than it was supposed to.

What the small private ones do anyway

Michael Norton and Francesco Gino published work in 2014 on people who had suffered a loss, and found that performing a ritual afterwards was associated with less grief. What appeared to matter was not the content, which was often idiosyncratic and privately invented, but the sense of having acted.

It is a laboratory finding with a modest effect and it should be held lightly rather than quoted as a law. The direction is the interesting part. A ritual is a way of doing something at moments when there is nothing to be done.

Which is most mornings

Nothing needs doing at six in the morning. That is precisely when a practice earns its place, and also why it collapses so easily back into routine. The same fifteen minutes, performed without attention, is just a slower way of getting caffeine into a body.

The line between the two is not effort or equipment. It is presence. Anything made while answering email is a routine with extra steps, however carefully the steps were chosen.

We would rather not decorate this

An enormous amount of writing uses the word ritual to make ordinary buying feel significant. It is one of the easier sales available and we are not interested in making it. Coffee is not a sacrament. It is a warm drink that happens to occupy the one slot in the day where almost nothing else is scheduled, which is most of why it works.

What is actually true is narrower. A repeated act, performed with attention, marks time. Time that goes unmarked disappears at a rate that tends to surprise people somewhere in their thirties.

We make one of the instruments. What the fifteen minutes are for is not ours to specify, and brands that try to specify it are usually selling something other than what is in the bag.

If you want to know which of the two you have, the test is short. Ask what would change if you skipped it tomorrow. A routine: nothing, and you would be slightly less awake. A ritual: you would notice all day.